Archive for category Censorship

Totalitarianism in the US: An Accident Waiting to Happen

By Numerian
First appeared in The Agonist

Listening to Paul Ryan’s speech at the Republican National Convention, I couldn’t place where I had come across something quite like this before. Then it struck me – Pravda! I used to subscribe to Pravda in high school and college, first to learn Russian, and second, to pursue a college program in Soviet studies. Pravda was a newspaper that specialized in the Big Lie – the Five Year Plan was always ahead of schedule, Soviet industrial capabilities exceeded that of any other country, people were starving on streets all across America. The newspaper was a non-stop stream of lies, just as Paul Ryan’s speech was studded with Big Lies – lies that were easily disprovable, such as Barack Obama did nothing about the Simpson-Bowles recommendations to reduce the budget deficit (Paul Ryan didn’t mention he voted against these recommendations when the House killed any chance of enacting them); or that Obama made it easier for people to live off welfare (the President altered the enrollment rules of welfare at the request of Republican governors); or the Romney favorite – Obama cut over $700 billion of Medicare benefits for individuals (the cuts were imposed on hospitals and insurance companies, not beneficiaries, and Romney has the same cuts in his economic plan).  (Image:  Wikipedia) Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Tampa has sort of transformed into a police state” NO KIDDING!


Here you go.  The Mayor and City Council of Tampa are all Democrats.  But there’s a national security state consensus of the “elect,” Three thousand militarized police making sure of what?  Caged protesters escorted by armed guards:  is this why we elected a constitutional law professor as President.  What more could the Republicans want?  It’s their script from the Houston Plan to the Patriot Act, both parties seek overwhelming power over citizens exercising their First Amendment rights.


Tampa Bay Online article for video (with extensive pics)
We Are Change - (activist coalition web site) Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , ,

Freedom of the Press, McClatchy’s Washington Bureau establishes no-alter quote policy

McClatchy’s Washington Bureau establishes no-alter quote policy

Posted on Fri, Jul. 20, 2012

As advocates of the First Amendment, we cannot be intimidated into letting the government control our work. When The New York Times agreed with Bush Administration officials to delay publication of its story of illegal wiretaps of Americans until after the 2004 election, it did the nation a great disservice. Acceding to the Obama administration’s efforts to censor our work to have it more in line with their political spin is another disservice to America.  James Asher, Washington Bureau Chief

To our staff and to our readers:

As you are aware, reporters from The New York Times, Washington Post, Bloomberg and others are agreeing to give government sources the right to clear and alter quotes as a prerequisite to granting an interview.

To be clear, it is the bureau’s policy that we do not alter accurate quotes from any source. And to the fullest extent possible, we do not make deals that we will clear quotes as a condition of interviews.
Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , ,

Rupert Watch, Lord Justice Damns Inquiry

By Michael Collins



(Washington, 2/30/2012)  At the end of Monday’s Leveson Inquiry with Tony Blair on the stand, Lord Justice Leveson sent the credibility of the effort’s summary findings straight to Hell.  After Blair’s pressured presentation and an interruption by a protester who called Blair a war criminal, Leveson began an odd exchange with the former Prime Minister.  It began with this request to Blair:

 

Lord Justice Leveson:

2 So whatever assistance you can give, who have
3 thought about how you change things for the future, I’d
4 be very interested. Let me give you some potential
5 issues.  (May 28 transcript page 38)

If things had ended there, this could be seen as a modest invitation, one Leveson might have offered any number of witnesses as a general courtesy.  But the justice was not finished.  He outlined specific issues covering five pages of transcript.

This was no a casual request.  We witnessed the supposedly objective judge of press excesses recruiting a former politician who had just spent several hours intermittently bemoaning to Queen’s Counsel (QC) Robert Jay just how difficult it was for him to deal with the press. Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Alabama Judicial Scandal Could Taint Many Cases, Not Just Siegelman’s

By Andrew Kreig


An Alabama newspaper exposed a scandal May 16 that deserves national prominence. The headline was “Federal judge’s lengthy affair with court worker is exposed.”

This is a scandal not simply for the judge, Mark Everett Fuller, shown at right in a photo by my research colleague Phil Fleming. It is a lifetime shame for those in the Justice Department, federal court system and the United States Senate who have coddled and protected him for an entire decade during his obvious previous disgraces.

It was fully a decade ago that Fuller was first accused by Alabama’s pension officials at their highest level of trying to bilk the system out of $330,000. Yet Alabama’s two senators pushed Fuller forward for a lifetime appointment, which Fuller received from voice vote by the United States Senate with no serious discussion of his past. Fuller and his court staff were even able to hide from public view a 180-page impeachment filing against him in 2003 with no apparent attempt at investigation.

A corrupt federal judge is in position to create vast harm in both civil and criminal cases, especially when he controls the court administrative system, as Fuller did during a seven-year term from 2004 to 2011 as chief judge for Alabama’s most important federal district. This is the middle district surrounding the capital city of Montgomery.

Let’s start with today’s disclosures and then get to the implications. Montgomery Independent Publisher and Editor Bob Martin published a front-page news story quoting divorce papers filed April 10 by Lisa Boyd Fuller, the judge’s estranged wife of three decades. Her papers strongly suggested adultery. Interrogatories asked about drug use.  Martin’s news story, distributed May 16 to a syndicate of 25 regional papers, reported:
Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Murdoch Watch – the Kiss of Death

By Michael Collins

When things don’t work out, doing business with Murdoch can be the kiss of death.

No matter how hard you try, how loyal you are, if something goes wrong, you can be sure it will be your fault.

Reporting has failed to lay the proper foundation for understanding Rupert Murdoch’s remarkable testimony before the Leveson Inquiry in London and his behavior of late.

Rupert Murdoch is a nihilist.

Murdoch’s television outlets in the United States stoked the fires for the 2003 invasion of Iraq based on outrageous misrepresentations like the idea that Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. The war cost tens of thousands of dead and seriously injured U.S. soldiers, several hundred thousand dead Iraqi civilians, and $3 trillion. (Image: acb)

Last summer, Murdoch went full throttle to support Republicans in the U.S. Congress as they fabricated a debt ceiling crisis that seriously damaged the credit rating of the United States of America.

Murdoch’s support of the Tea Party created an utterly irrational voice in U.S. politics that prevents even the most modest necessary reforms. Created by right wing lobbyists, this pseudo party blocks every vital project, from reviving the economy to an effective, coordinated response to the crisis created by climate change.

In the nations occupied by his multinational media empire Murdoch takes the path of maximum damage to the public and governance.
Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Gagging Canadian environmental scientists – stuck to the tar sands

How about this?  The Harper government is reviving the old Soviet system of controlling what scientists say, in this case environmental scientists. (Image: Isaac Mao)  Take a look at this report:

Government media minders are being dispatched to an international polar conference in Montreal to monitor and record what Environment Canada scientists say to reporters.

“If you are approached by the media, ask them for their business card and tell them that you will get back to them with a time for (an) interview,” the Environment Canada scientists were told by email late last week.

“Send a message to your media relations contact and they will organize the interview. They will most probably be with you during the interview to assist and record,” says the email obtained by Postmedia News.   Vancouver Sun, April 23

Why would Harper this?  Did he mistake 1984 for an instruction manual?  Is he nuts?  No to both.  This is not about control per se, it is bout tr sands, the cruel hoax that promises riches beyond imagination (they think).  Harper probably got word someone would simply tell the truth.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: