Archive for category Constitution

Elective Amnesia: Why does George W. Bush get a free ride?

 photo bushwikipedia_zps61602900.jpg

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. George Santayana

George Bush lost the 2000 election by half a million votes.  When the state of Florida wanted to recount votes, Bush operatives disrupted the disreputable Florida elections commissions that held the key to a fair count.  But there was no point. Lists of felons from the Governor Bush Texas government were used to knock 50,000 legally registered voters off the Florida voting lists.  Many of whom were minority voters.  Turnout in Florida was very high.  Without that preemptive strike, there would have been no recount necessary.  Bush would have lost Florida outright.  The 2000 election was stolen. (Image)

Bush got in and immediately planned an invasion of Iraq, the greatest foreign policy disaster in the history of the country.  The true cost is over three trillion dollars.

Commander in chief Bush presided over a profound command failure leading up to 9/by failing to acknowledge overwhelming intelligence evidence of a plot to attack U.S. skyscrapers with airplanes.  The military command was so disarrayed; the U.S. Air Force could only mount a few fighters in defense and they arrived late.

Bush took Clinton era deregulation and allowed Wall Street to set up a big casino scam that brought the economy and many of the people to their knees financially.

Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , ,

Totalitarianism in the US: An Accident Waiting to Happen

By Numerian
First appeared in The Agonist

Listening to Paul Ryan’s speech at the Republican National Convention, I couldn’t place where I had come across something quite like this before. Then it struck me – Pravda! I used to subscribe to Pravda in high school and college, first to learn Russian, and second, to pursue a college program in Soviet studies. Pravda was a newspaper that specialized in the Big Lie – the Five Year Plan was always ahead of schedule, Soviet industrial capabilities exceeded that of any other country, people were starving on streets all across America. The newspaper was a non-stop stream of lies, just as Paul Ryan’s speech was studded with Big Lies – lies that were easily disprovable, such as Barack Obama did nothing about the Simpson-Bowles recommendations to reduce the budget deficit (Paul Ryan didn’t mention he voted against these recommendations when the House killed any chance of enacting them); or that Obama made it easier for people to live off welfare (the President altered the enrollment rules of welfare at the request of Republican governors); or the Romney favorite – Obama cut over $700 billion of Medicare benefits for individuals (the cuts were imposed on hospitals and insurance companies, not beneficiaries, and Romney has the same cuts in his economic plan).  (Image:  Wikipedia) Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Polite Fascism Contracts The Right To Vote – The turning point for VoterID legislation

Introduction: The article below was written right after the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision upholding Indiana’s Voter ID law.  By upholding that law, the court allowed subsequent laws restricting the right to vote throughout the country. 

Voter ID laws require that citizens present a photo identification before they cast their ballot.   This requirement solves a fictional problem, “voter fraud,” individuals voting illegally.  I review the court’s decision based on totally inadequate evidence and provide background on the little-discussed origin of laws like this.   As Civil War Reconstruction ended, the KKK and other white supremacist groups in the Old South sought to stop black Americans from voting.  The laws did just that for decades until the Voting Rights Act helped correct the problem.

There is no more reason for Voter ID laws now than there was in 2008, unless the goal is to suppress voting by the poor, the young, and minorities.  These groups are far more likely to be without an acceptable photographic identification than the rest of the population.

Michael Collins, August 30, 2012

(Links to core documents and scholarship on this subject are provided at the end of the document.)

—————————

Polite Fascism Contracts The Right To Vote

Scoop Independent News (First Published)
Tuesday, 13 May 2008, 8:45 pm

Column: Michael Collins

Another Supreme Outrage


Justices Stevens, Kennedy, and Roberts combined with Scalia, Alito, and
Thomas to take voting rights back to1898. Image (left), Image (right)

Polite Fascism Contracts The Right To Vote

William Crawford, et al, Petitioners 07-21 v.
Marion County Elections Board et al.

Indiana Democratic Party, et al., Petitioners 07-25 v. Todd Rokita,
Indiana Secretary of State, et al.
U. S. ____ (2008) Opinion of STEVENS, J.

By Michael Collins

They wear their robes but leave the hoods off, the polite justices of the Supreme Court. They write decisions then issue them in a formal setting, behind the columns of a capitol monument, with a history that confers a dignity not deserved. The Court embodies the dilemma of our modern culture. The most awful acts are committed with bland justification by polite people who hide behind institutional trappings; for the sake of the few, at the expense of the many. Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Freedom of the Press, McClatchy’s Washington Bureau establishes no-alter quote policy

McClatchy’s Washington Bureau establishes no-alter quote policy

Posted on Fri, Jul. 20, 2012

As advocates of the First Amendment, we cannot be intimidated into letting the government control our work. When The New York Times agreed with Bush Administration officials to delay publication of its story of illegal wiretaps of Americans until after the 2004 election, it did the nation a great disservice. Acceding to the Obama administration’s efforts to censor our work to have it more in line with their political spin is another disservice to America.  James Asher, Washington Bureau Chief

To our staff and to our readers:

As you are aware, reporters from The New York Times, Washington Post, Bloomberg and others are agreeing to give government sources the right to clear and alter quotes as a prerequisite to granting an interview.

To be clear, it is the bureau’s policy that we do not alter accurate quotes from any source. And to the fullest extent possible, we do not make deals that we will clear quotes as a condition of interviews.
Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , ,

“Never in my wildest nightmares”

Kagan Health Care Vote Raises New Questions

Democratic Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan joined conservative justices June 28 in a 7-2 vote to strike down Medicaid expansion by states under the Obama-backed Affordable Care Act. Kagan, at left, joined the first ruling since the 1930s to void federal legislation for exceeding congressional power under the Commerce Clause.

Her vote has escaped major attention in the general media because a separate 5-4 majority, including her, upheld the law’s insurance mandate on the grounds that Congress could impose it as a “tax.” But her legal rationale has important long-term consequences for other federal legislation if the Court starts returning to a theory court conservatives used during the New Deal until 1937 to thwart Democratic legislation.

Legal critic Glenn Greenwald noted problems with her opinion in a Salon column excerpted below entitled, Kagan’s Medicaid vote. Greenwald, like the Justice Integrity Project, opposed Kagan’s Senate confirmation to Supreme Court in 2010. Our Project did so out of concerns over her commitment to civil rights. Greenwald shared those views, but also regarded her as a shaky replacement for Republican liberal John Paul Stevens Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , ,

Edwards Verdict Shows Excesses By DOJ Corruption-Probers

By Andrew Kreig

The failure of federal prosecutors May 31 to win guilty verdicts against former Democratic Presidential contender John Edwards on campaign violations illustrates the Justice Department’s ongoing arrogance and incompetence in politically sensitive cases.

The Justice Department’s crusade to imprison Edwards for up to 30 years on highly dubious charges showed poor judgment when the relevant campaign finance law is so murky. And now a federal jury empaneled in North Carolina has agreed by rendering an acquittal on one charge and no decision on the remaining five counts. The mistrial continues an extraordinary series of defeats and controversial results for the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section, an elite unit that is supposed to preserve public trust in government by prevailing against the nation’s most corrupt officials in the most important cases.

As in recent high-profile cases stretching from Alabama to Alaska over the past four years, the unit has again humiliated itself, needlessly hurt defendants and wasted millions of dollars in taxpayer funds. Edwards is at right in a file photo from his term as a North Carolina senator before his current disgrace for cheating on his ailing wife, fathering an illegitimate daughter and trying to hide his affair.

“To pick this kind of case and spend tens of millions of dollars to prosecute a failed presidential candidate just doesn’t make any sense to me,” commented Bush-appointed former Federal Election Commission Chairman Michael Toner. A Republican, he is now a partner at the powerhouse Washington law firm of Wiley Rein. “I’m not a fan of John Edwards or his underlying conduct,” Toner continued, “but I never thought it was a violation of the federal election laws, let alone a criminal violation.” Among others denouncing the Edwards prosecution as ill-conceived have been campaign finance lawyer Brett Kappel, who said the verdict was no surprise because “it was a difficult legal theory to prove.” Another is Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz, who published a column, Edwards’ Jury Couldn’t Decide and for Good Reason.
Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

Books Banned in Arizona – Latinos Fighting Thought Control

By Michael Collins

Bad things are happening in Arizona … again. Good things too!

The extremist Arizona legislature enacted a law that just recently caused the banning of nearly 100 books from Tucson public schools. The list includes prominent Latino authors, plus Shakespeare, Thoreau, and James Baldwin. They even banned Zorro!

The real goal was to totally dismantle the Tucson school district’s Mexican American Studies program. Mission accomplished. The program is gone. Not a class survived.

The enabling act, Arizona House Bill 2281, contains some lofty language. It requires that school districts teach students to “value each other as individuals.” They cannot be instructed to “hate other races” or “overthrow the United States government.” Promoting “resentment toward a race or class of people” or “ethnic solidarity” is forbidden. A bit overdone but it has some potential, right?

The law was just a smokescreen to cover ethnically based attacks on Latinos students in Tucson schools. Neither the banned books nor the dismantled Mexican American Studies program violated any of the provisions listed yet the law banned the books and ended the program. Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,