Archive for category Phone Hacking

War Heroes, War Criminals Remembered on Memorial Day

From the Justice Integrity Project

By Andrew Kreig

As the United States honored war veterans on Memorial Day May 28, an investigating committee in the United Kingdom questioned former Prime Minister Tony Blair about suspicions that media mogul Rupert Murdoch corruptly influenced his decision-making.

Ton Blair and George BushBlair denied to the Leveson Inquiry any improper conduct during his decade as Prime Minister between 1997 and 2007, which encompassed Blair’s support for the Iraq War favored by both Murdock and U.S. President Bush, shown at left awarding Blair the Presidential Medal of Freedom in a 2004 ceremony at the White House.

Coverage by columnist Michael Collins of the Blair testimony is excerpted below, drawn from his column, Rupert Watch: Tony Blair Lying at the Leveson Inquiry. Collins, at right, began this way about Blair, leader of the traditionally left Labour Party and thus a seemingly unlikely ally for either Murdoch or Bush:

Michael CollinsHe [Blair] retains that familiar fatuous exuberance for failed policies and continues to deny the deadly lies he told in over a decade as Prime Minister. He was, as always, quite literally unbearable.

President George W. Bush had major problems selling his disastrous invasion plans for Iraq. The public smelled a rat. Strong majorities of both Democrats and Republicans opposed a preemptive invasion without confirmation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) by UN inspectors. That was during December 2002 and January 2003. Bush needed something special to push his diabolic plan over the top. Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , ,

Rupert Watch, Tony Blair Lying at the Leveson Inquiry

By Michael Collins

(Washington, 5/28/2012) Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair testified before the Leveson Inquiry today. He retains that familiar fatuous exuberance for failed policies and continues to deny the deadly lies he told in over a decade as Prime Minister. He was, as always, quite literally unbearable.(Image: Niecieden)

President George W. Bush had major problems selling his disastrous invasion plans for Iraq. The public smelled a rat. Strong majorities of both Democrats and Republicans opposed a preemptive invasion without confirmation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) by UN inspectors. That was during December 2002 and January 2003. Bush needed something special to push his diabolic plan over the top.

Blair’s government released two fraudulent intelligence papers during the critical period just before the March 2003 Iraq invasion, the September 2002 report and the Iraq or Dodgy Dossier in early February 2003. Rupert Murdoch’s media cartel led the charge for war. He headlined stories about both bogus reports including the outrageous claim that Iraq could launch chemical weapons at the invaders within 45 minutes of an attack and the big lie about Iraq seeking uranium from Niger to develop nuclear weapons.

Blair and Murdoch worked together to provide Bush with the credibility to tell the most disastrous lie ever told by a president:

“The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.” George W. Bush, State of the Union, January 29, 2003 Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Rebekah Brooks, Witness for the Prosecution

By Michael Collins

Criminal charges against Rupert Murdoch insider and favorite Rebekah Brooks may be a prelude to looming charges arising out of Brooks’ testimony before the Leveson Inquiry last week.

Crown Prosecution Services charged Brooks, her husband, and four others with conspiracy to pervert the course of justice on Tuesday May 15. The alleged conspiracy took place between July 6 and July 19, 2011.

Brooks and the co-conspirators concealed and removed materials sought by police in their investigation of phone hacking by Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation subsidiary, News International, according to prosecutors. Brooks resigned as chief executive officer of the subsidiary on July 15, 2011. (Image: SnowViolent)

Brooks’ current legal troubles should not obscure the significance of her testimony before the Leveson Inquiry last week. During her several hours on the witness stand, she was confronted with an explosive email that, if true, implicates Conservative Party Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt in a conspiracy to pervert the British regulatory process in favor of News Corporation’s bid to acquire the ten-million-subscriber pay TV company BSkyB.  News Corp owns 39% of the company.  It sought the remaining 61%. Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,

When was the last time a legislative body denounced any business leader by name?

By Michael Collins

May Day!  How remarkable (even though Rupert Murdoch was denounced by a committee of the House of Commons, not the entire body).   Murdoch is “not a fit person” to run “a major international company,” we were told in a report released by the Commons’ committee investigating phone hacking on May 1).  He may not be unbalanced, as Murdoch  recently characterized former Prime Minister Gordon Brown, but he’s certainly not fit.  (Image)

Here’s some of what this means:

1)  There’s no way Murdoch will survive the regulatory investigation on his ownership of media in Great Britain..  One of Ofcom’s charters (the regulatory body) is to determine if Murdoch is a “fit and proper” person to own BSkyB and other British media properties.
2)  When it looks like Murdoch has to divest the 39% News Corp interest in the highly profitable BSkyB pay TV network, institutional shareholders will Kirk out!  The Sky enterprise amounted to 20% plus of News Corp’s 2011 profits.  Oops!
3)   Murdoch won’t go gentle into the dark night.  He will become increasingly irrational as seen in his sting operation against his once loyal servant David Cameron.  It is fair to assume that he’s got more dirt on public officials than J. Edgar ever had … and he’ll start using it.
4)  Murdoch will retain the continued loyalty of the News Corp board (see members listed below).  After the release of the condemnation by the Commons committee, Murdoch’s board released a statement expressing “full confidence in Rupert Murdoch’s fitness and support for his continuing to lead News Corporation into the future as its Chairman and CEO.”
5) Murdoch may get the bums rush out of News Corp as a result of an institutional investor like the Christian Brothers Investment Services which has said it would ask the SEC to change the voting rights of shareholders (Murdoch has outsized representation in voting shares).

Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , ,

Hmmm … Murdoch’s News Corp reduces foreign voting shares to keep U.S. TV licenses

By Michael Collins

Is Murdoch getting ready to trade his kingdom for a horse?  Supposedly, News Corp did a compliance review on the voting rights of foreign shareholders.  The company discovered that it was way out of line for the amount of foreign shareholder voting rights, thus imperiling its bid to renew the licenses for it’s domestic television properties (based on the Communications Act of 1934).

“News Corp, which has spent most of the last year battling the fallout from the News of the World phone-hacking scandal, inadvertently allowed foreign investors to hold 36pc of Class B voting stock – well past the 25pc limit enshrined in American 1934 Communications Act.

“In order to fix the problem, on Wednesday it suspended 50pc of the Class B voting rights of its investors outside the US, effectively halving the power of certain foreign investors.”  The Telegraph, April 18 &  Financial Times, April 18

This includes Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, Saudi investor, who will have his 7% share cut in half for voting.  Talal is a big Murdoch supporter.

Two points.  This is a sign of weakness.  They knew or should have known this was the case but now they’re acting.  News Corp probably got a tip from some “friendly” in government and preemptively corrected the problem.  One commentator asked, When was the last time they reviewed voting rights, 1936?

The prompts the second point, which consists of three questions?  Was News Corp out of compliance on foreign voting shares when it last renewed it’s domestic broadcasting license?  Will anyone in authority investigate?  If they determine that the licenses were renewed with News Corp violating the 1934 Communications Act, will anything be done about it?

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , ,