Hannah Furness of The Telegraph reported that BBC used a 2003 photograpy from a well known professional photographer to show dead Syrians from a recent massacre Marco di Lauro confirmed, without any doubt, that it was his photograph (here). BBC referred to it as an unattributed photograph that they thought was of the recently killed Syrians. How hard would it have been for them to find out? Maybe do an image search, which would raise questions. No lets just use the photograph, we’ll trust the alleged source.
Why believe anything they say about any massacres, Arab Springs, etc. They think we’re idiots.