Posts Tagged James Murdoch

The Independent: News International ‘tried to blackmail select committee’

News International ‘tried to blackmail select committee’

Martin Hickman, May 28, 2012

Detectives carrying out the multimillion-pound investigation into illegal newsgathering techniques at Rupert Murdoch’s British newspaper group have been asked to investigate whether it attempted to blackmail politicians.

The alleged plot centres on News International’s apparent efforts to warn off MPs on a parliamentary committee from disproving its discredited defence that phone hacking was the work of a single “rogue reporter”.

According to the former senior News of the World journalist Neville Thurlbeck, News International ordered the Sunday paper’s reporters to scour the private lives of MPs on the Commons Culture, Media and Sport Committee in 2009. At the time, Mr Murdoch’s company was mounting what it now admits was a mistakenly “aggressive” response to allegations that the interception of voicemail messages was rife at its headquarters in Wapping, east London. On the advice of the parliamentary authorities, the Labour MP Tom Watson has now asked the Metropolitan Police to investigate the allegation.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , ,

Murdoch Watch – the Kiss of Death

By Michael Collins

When things don’t work out, doing business with Murdoch can be the kiss of death.

No matter how hard you try, how loyal you are, if something goes wrong, you can be sure it will be your fault.

Reporting has failed to lay the proper foundation for understanding Rupert Murdoch’s remarkable testimony before the Leveson Inquiry in London and his behavior of late.

Rupert Murdoch is a nihilist.

Murdoch’s television outlets in the United States stoked the fires for the 2003 invasion of Iraq based on outrageous misrepresentations like the idea that Saddam Hussein was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. The war cost tens of thousands of dead and seriously injured U.S. soldiers, several hundred thousand dead Iraqi civilians, and $3 trillion. (Image: acb)

Last summer, Murdoch went full throttle to support Republicans in the U.S. Congress as they fabricated a debt ceiling crisis that seriously damaged the credit rating of the United States of America.

Murdoch’s support of the Tea Party created an utterly irrational voice in U.S. politics that prevents even the most modest necessary reforms. Created by right wing lobbyists, this pseudo party blocks every vital project, from reviving the economy to an effective, coordinated response to the crisis created by climate change.

In the nations occupied by his multinational media empire Murdoch takes the path of maximum damage to the public and governance.
Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Rupert watch – Apocalypse when?

By Michael Collins

Rupert Murdoch is in big trouble.  It is not a perfect storm but we’re getting there.

British attorney Mark Lewis is in New York to take legal action in behalf of clients who may have had their phones hacked in the United States.

More significantly, News Corp withdrew its bid to buy the remaining 61% of BSkyB, the highly profitable British cable TV franchise (£1.1 billion 2011, News Corp owns 39% now). (Murdoch images: left, right)

Last week, James Murdoch stepped down as chairman of BSkyB after surviving a challenge to his position just weeks ago. Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Andrew Kreig: Privacy Invasion Scandal Deepens for Murdoch

By Andrew Kreig
Justice Integrity Project

Rupert MurdochMajor new allegations of privacy invasion, influence-peddling and perjury involving Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp. continue to rivet the public in the United Kingdom. Murdoch, 80, founder of an empire instrumental in advancing the conservative agenda in the United States and worldwide, is portrayed at right in a photo courtesy of Wikipedia. A big question is whether he and his minions can confine the scandal primarily to the UK, and to losses of money and prestige. Or will the damage extend to United States holdings and political clout — and to dire liability for Murdoch family members who control his media holdings?

A sampling of the latest developments and analysis is provided below, primarily from progressive critics. Nearly all these critics, however, have proven their civil rights and non-partisan bona fides in the spirit of our Project by recent, scorching commentaries on privacy invasions and other violations of civil rights by the Obama administration. For example, Salon columnist Glenn Greenwald describes in the sample of commentary below from the past week a trend for Obama’s federal enforcers to seek more personal information without a court order. Here’s our news round-up, starting with Murdoch-watchers:

Full Article at Justice Integrity Project

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , ,

Murdoch in Free Fall – Credibility Gone Billions to Follow

Rupert and James Murdoch conjured up a fictional report that serves as the fig leaf used to cover the naughty secret of News Corporation –- they never investigated phone hacking in general and they never tried to clean house.

The House of Commons committee investigating Rupert Murdoch’s United Kingdom media properties released new evidence this week. The evidence elaborates on themes generated at the committee hearing of July 19 and adds new information to the toxic brew that threatens to drown the largest media company in the world. (Images: Hubert Burda Media, L, World Economic Forum)

At the July 19 hearing of the House of Commons Media, Sport and Culture Committee (Commons committee), Member of Parliament (MP) Tom Watson asked both Rupert and his son James Murdoch if either was aware of the “for Neville” memo concerning the 2008 phone hacking settlement by the News of the World (NoW). The Murdoch paper’s on-staff private detective, Glenn Mulcaire, was caught tapping the voicemail of Gordon Taylor, chief executive of the Professional Footballers Association.

Rupert and James Murdoch both denied any knowledge of the memo prior to the extraordinary £725,000 out of court settlement of the Taylor suit.
Read the rest of this entry »

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share

Tags: , , , , , , ,